Register Now: Engineering LNP's Beyond the Liver for Genetic Medicines
News|Videos|August 28, 2026

How AI Could Accelerate Clinical Trial Design and Patient Recruitment

Eron Kelly, CEO of ConcertAI, and Shaalan Beg, MD, chief medical officer, oncology, ConcertAI, discuss how artificial intelligence (AI) can accelerate clinical trial design, patient identification, and site selection while maintaining trust in clinical data.

Artificial intelligence (AI) could significantly reduce the time required for several traditionally labor-intensive steps in clinical trial planning, according to Eron Kelly, CEO of ConcertAI, and Shaalan Beg, MD, chief medical officer, oncology, ConcertAI, who discussed the technology’s potential in a recent video interview with BioPharm International.

Kelly explained that AI reasoning models can rapidly digitize inclusion and exclusion criteria, compare a proposed trial with similar studies listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, and identify relevant trial attributes. Tasks that previously required weeks of manual review could potentially be completed in minutes, he said.

How can AI improve clinical trial design and patient recruitment?

AI can also help sponsors assess whether an appropriate patient population exists within the current standard of care, particularly for second-line therapies. Kelly said these analyses can help sponsors identify potential clinical trial sites based on historical patient populations and ultimately accelerate enrollment and drug development.

The potential benefits extend to patients as well as sponsors, Kelly said, because faster trial execution could help patients access investigational treatments while enabling sponsors to bring therapies to market more quickly.

For Beg, however, trustworthiness is essential when AI is used to abstract and interpret clinical data. He described a three-step validation process designed to ensure that information extracted from medical records is both accurate and clinically meaningful.

The process begins with abstraction accuracy, determining whether information was correctly extracted from the patient record. The second step, record coherence, examines whether the information makes sense within the patient’s clinical timeline. Finally, cohort calibration evaluates whether the resulting patient cohort is biologically and clinically relevant to the questions being asked by practitioners, researchers, and R&D teams.

Beg emphasized that each stage must be satisfied before the information moves forward, underscoring the importance of validation as AI becomes more deeply integrated into clinical research.

Check out part one of this four-part interview here. Watch part two here.


Related to this article

Stainless steel bioreactor vessels in a manufacturing facility. | Image Credit: © Corona Borealis - stock.adobe.com
Four cell therapy developers have pulled back from ex vivo manufacturing in the past month — ArsenalBio, TScan Therapeutics, and Cellectis all pivoted to in vivo approaches, while Bristol Myers Squibb terminated its manufacturing partnership with automation specialist Cellares after determining its platform couldn't meet requirements for commercial Breyanzi production, triggering layoffs.
The BioPharm Brief: Survival, Gene Editing, and Skin Cancer
This episode of the BioPharm Brief highlights Roche’s Tam-Peli phase 3 survival data in relapsed small-cell lung cancer, Cellectis’ shift to in vivo gene editing for lipid disorders, and Phio Pharmaceuticals’ FDA briefing package for PH-762 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.