Johnson & Johnson has announced results from a phase 3 study (MonumenTAL-3) showing that talquetamab-tgvs (Talvey), a GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody, combined with daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj (Darzalex Faspro) with or without pomalidomide, significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by up to 72% and the risk of death by up to 53% compared to standard-of-care daratumumab-pomalidomide-dexamethasone (DPd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1
Key facts
- Drug combination: Talquetamab (Talvey) + daratumumab/hyaluronidase (Darzalex Faspro) ± pomalidomide
- Class: GPRC5D bispecific T-cell engager + anti-CD38 antibody
- Indication: RRMM, ≥1 prior line (lenalidomide + PI exposed)
- Trial: MonumenTAL-3; Phase 3; NCT05455320 (n=864)
- PFS (24 mo): 81.3% (Tal-DP) vs 51.2% (DPd)
- OS (24 mo): 89.2% (Tal-DP) vs 79.1% (DPd)
- MRD-negative ≥CR: 52.3% (Tal-DP) vs 15.9% (DPd)
- Key toxicity: CRS 67.8% (Tal-DP), mostly grade 1–2
- On-target AEs: Taste change, weight loss (talquetamab class effect)
- Regulatory status: sBLA (FDA), Type II variation (EMA) submitted
- Prior approval: Talquetamab (US/EU, 2023, ≥4 prior lines)
- Geography: Global (multicenter)
At 24 months, progression-free survival (PFS) rates reached up to 81.3% versus 51.2% with DPd, and overall survival (OS) rates reached up to 89.2% versus 79.1%. Results were presented at the 2026 European Hematology Association Annual Meeting and published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.1
"[Talvey] works with [Darzalex Faspro] in earlier lines—a critical time for treating patients with the most effective regimens," said Peter Voorhees, MD, Professor of Hematology and Oncology at Atrium Health, Levine Cancer Institute at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, in a company press release.1
What did the MonumenTAL-3 trial design and efficacy results show?
MonumenTAL-3 (NCT05455320) is an ongoing phase 3 study evaluating talquetamab plus subcutaneous daratumumab with (Tal-DP) or without (Tal-D) pomalidomide versus DPd in 864 patients with RRMM who had received at least one prior line of therapy including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor. Most patients were refractory to lenalidomide (85.1%) and to their last line of therapy (93.4%); 11.8% had prior anti-CD38 antibody exposure.
At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, PFS was significantly improved with Tal-DP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20–0.40; p<0.0001) and Tal-D (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24–0.46; p<0.0001), with 24-month PFS rates of 81.3% and 77.6%, respectively. Overall response rates were 88.2% (Tal-DP), 88.5% (Tal-D), and 77.6% (DPd). Rates of complete response or better were 71.1%, 68.9%, and 34.5%, while measurable-residual-disease-negative ≥complete response rates (10⁻⁵, next-generation sequencing) were 52.3%, 46.3%, and 15.9%. OS was significantly improved with Tal-DP (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30–0.73) and Tal-D (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.33–0.78), with 24-month OS rates of 89.2% and 87.9% versus 79.1% with DPd.1
What is the clinical context and unmet need in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma?
RRMM is the third most common hematologic malignancy worldwide, with more than 180,000 new cases diagnosed annually and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 59.8%.2 While treatment advances have extended survival from years to decades across disease stages, most patients eventually relapse and require sequential lines of therapy, with efficacy typically diminishing with each successive regimen.3 Bispecific T-cell-engaging (TCE) antibodies have demonstrated promising activity in heavily pretreated RRMM, and the MonumenTAL-3 trial represents an effort to determine whether this benefit extends to earlier treatment lines, in which patients may have greater physiologic reserve and less cumulative disease burden.