
News|Articles|August 26, 2026
FAQ: What FDA’s New Approach to Biosimilar Interchangeability Means for Developers
Author(s)Emily Schoenthaler
FDA's 2025–2026 guidance changes would substantially streamline biosimilar development, including by reducing comparative efficacy and switching-study requirements. Here's what's confirmed, what industry has criticized about the existing pathway, and what's still unresolved.
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDA is proposing a significantly less burdensome path for biosimilar developers, with changes that could reduce several clinical studies historically used to support biosimilar and interchangeable biosimilar applications. The changes could lower development costs and timelines, but because the recommendations remain in draft form, important questions about how the revised framework will work in practice remain.¹,²
Related to this article

HHS announced four senior FDA leadership selections, including Karim Mikhail as permanent Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and Michael Davis as Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, capping more than a year of turnover at both centers.

Phio's PH-762 posted a 70% response rate in skin cancer, supporting its FDA briefing package for a planned phase 2b trial.

Lundbeck's asedebart, which blocks ACTH signaling at its source, has won FDA orphan status for endogenous Cushingsyndrome.

Satralizumab cut MOGAD relapse risk 68% in a phase 3 trial, positioning it as the first potential treatment for this rare disease.

Ersodetug missed its phase 3 primary endpoint in congenital HI, but FDA is reviewing CGM data showing 50%+ hypoglycemia reductions.

mAbxience and Sandoz are targeting a $5.7 billion market with a proposed emicizumab biosimilar for hemophilia A.

Fayuvi scored 23.5 points higher than untreated peers on cognitive testing, backing the first-ever approval for a Sanfilippo syndrome A gene therapy.
Advertisement
Advertisement

