Content is king in publishing, but interpretation is imperator.
Content is king in publishing, but interpretation is imperator. Marie Brown, group vice president at RX (organizers of the INTERPHEX conference) recognized this fact when underlining the new relationship between INTERPHEX and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) saying, “We are excited that AAPS will elevate and expand the content to attract and satisfy the educational needs of research scientists and provide that important link between science and commercialization” (1). The skill to knit together coherent and actionable messages from disparate data inputs is what sets a premium on great interpretation over great content alone. As if to embody this very message, Annette Bak, head of drug delivery at AstraZeneca, modeled a splendid T shirt at the 2022 AAPS PharmSci 360 conference that said a researcher is “an expert at identifying, collecting, generating, interpreting, and analyzing data…”
The point being that while its truly wonderful to see, touch, and admire a vast ocean of sophisticated tools, reagents, instruments, and packaging machinery, it is far better to hear and understand why each advance or twist in engineering makes a sizable difference on next process steps, on required resources (including time), and eventually, and on how all this matters to the biology of a patient.
Context and alternative choice matters. In this edition, we have an article on “Process Development and Control for New Modalities” discussing challenges and choices arising from molecular diversity (see page 10). The lack of platform processes is obvious when considering specific modalities. Process and analytical standardization is a challenge for messenger RNA (mRNA) because of the diverse types of mRNA and different encapsulation technologies, according to experts cited in the article.
The task of relating what is happening is simple and useful. But the utility of hearing what is driving choice, and what alternate strategies are effective, is a value beyond reckoning. This is why conference season is so valuable, and why as much as can be crystalized and distilled into print is the mission of the publisher’s role. As always, we hope you will share what you have learned also.
1. J. Davis, AAPS Media Advisory, Oct. 19, 2022.
Chris Spivey is the editorial director of BioPharm International.
BioPharm International
Vol. 35, No. 11
November 2022
Pages: 6
When referring to this article, please cite it as C. Spivey, "Conference Time Brings Gifts," BioPharm International 35 (11) 6 (2022).
Stay at the forefront of biopharmaceutical innovation—subscribe to BioPharm International for expert insights on drug development, manufacturing, compliance, and more.
Mechanistic Hypothesis of Toxicity: Driving Decision Making in Preclinical Translation
July 31st 2025Mechanistic toxicity hypothesis is essential in guiding decision-making and predicting toxicities during the preclinical stages of drug development. The authors highlight the growing importance of integrating advanced technologies like mass spectrometry imaging into toxicology to enhance preclinical translation, foster innovation in therapeutic development, and ultimately improve drug safety and efficacy.