SystImmune and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) announced on October 26, 2026, that izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in the phase 3 PANKU-Lung01 study.¹ Iza-bren is an investigational dual-targeting epidermal growth factor receptor × human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (EGFRxHER3) bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC).
Key facts
- Drug: izalontamab brengitecan (iza-bren; SystImmune/BMS)
- Class: EGFRxHER3 bispecific ADC
- Indication studied: EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC (post-EGFR TKI)
- Trial: PANKU-Lung01 (NCT06382116); phase 3
- Primary endpoint met: median PFS 11.1 vs 5.7 months (HR, 0.40)
- Secondary endpoints: ORR 60.2% vs 34.5%; OS immature
- Safety: ILD in 0.9%; 1.9% TRAE discontinuation
- Regulatory status: breakthrough therapy designation (FDA)
- Geography: mainland China
The trial enrolled patients with previously treated EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results come from a prespecified interim analysis reported by SystImmune's parent company, Sichuan Biokin Pharmaceutical (Biokin). They were set for a late-breaking oral presentation at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2026 Annual Congress in Madrid, Spain, with simultaneous publication in The Lancet, according to the companies.¹
"When EGFR-mutated NSCLC progresses after an EGFR TKI [tyrosine kinase inhibitor] therapy, patients and physicians have historically had few effective treatment options, with chemotherapy often serving as the default, though it offers limited survival benefit," said Li Zhang, chief lung cancer expert at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, in a company press release.¹
What did the PANKU-Lung01 trial show?
The randomized, multicenter trial (NCT06382116) enrolled patients whose disease progressed after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The registry record specifies progression during or after a third-generation EGFR TKI.¹,² At a median PFS follow-up of 14.6 months, median PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 11.1 months with iza-bren (n=216) vs 5.7 months with PBC (n=206) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.51; p<.0001).¹
The confirmed objective response rate by BICR was 60.2% with iza-bren vs 34.5% with PBC, and median duration of response was 10.4 months vs 5.7 months.¹ Overall survival, a secondary endpoint, was immature, although the companies reported a favorable trend toward improved survival with iza-bren.¹
How safe was iza-bren in this population?
No new safety signals were observed, according to the companies.¹ Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were predominantly hematologic and were managed with standard supportive care. Only 1.9% of patients in the iza-bren group discontinued treatment due to TRAEs.¹ Adjudicated interstitial lung disease occurred in 2 patients (0.9%), 1 grade 3 and 1 grade 1.¹