Today’s biopharma news highlights how new data could reduce treatment burden, improve excipient information sharing, and shape future options for patients with difficult-to-treat cancers.
News|Articles|October 31, 2024
The Difference Between Compliance and Quality
Author(s)Pharmatech
Our journey from compliance to quality is rooted in deep traditions, but are those traditions helping us or hurting us? Focusing solely on inspecting for compliance is not sufficient to prevent drug shortages nor ensure drug quality. This talk discusses the quality management maturity (QMM) model, how to move to a culture of quality, common areas of improvement, what to expect.
Related to this article
Daiichi Sankyo and Merck pulled ifinatamab deruxtecan's FDA filing in small cell lung cancer after a 187-patient trial fell short.
IPEC’s EIP user guide streamlines information exchange and response times while increasing accuracy through standardization.
Insulin efsitora alfa-gobe (Onswik) cuts injections from 365 to 52 a year for adults with type 2 diabetes, per its new FDA approval.
Genentech is paying Earendil Labs $55 million upfront in a deal worth over $1.5 billion to develop bispecific antibodies for hard-to-treat cancers.
Acuitas CEO Dr Thomas Madden and NanoVation co-founder and president Dr Dominik Witzigmann discuss how LNP engineering is expanding genetic medicine applications to traditionally undruggable targets.
Guselkumab eased spinal pain, stiffness, and MRI-confirmed spinal inflammation in a 411-patient trial of psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement.
AstraZeneca's sBLA for durvalumab combined with neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, based on the Phase 3 VOLGA trial, has a PDUFA date expected in the fourth quarter of 2026.