
Regulatory Uncertainty Surfaces as FDA Blames COVID Vaccines for 10 Child Deaths
Key Takeaways
- The FDA memo links 10 child deaths to COVID-19 vaccines, primarily due to myocarditis, raising questions about evidence strength.
- Potential regulatory changes could require larger safety datasets and longer follow-up periods, impacting vaccine development timelines and costs.
FDA’s internal findings raise new concerns over pediatric vaccine safety and signal potential regulatory shifts affecting future COVID-19 vaccine development.
A newly revealed internal memo from FDA reportedly links at least 10 child deaths to COVID-19 vaccination, marking a significant shift in how the
Sent by
However, earlier in
Why is this news important for drug manufacturing and vaccine development?
Because FDA has historically set the regulatory standards that
What evidence does FDA cite for potential vaccine-linked child deaths?
According to reports citing the internal memo, FDA reviewed 96 pediatric deaths reported between 2021 and 2024 and concluded that at least 10 are likely or possibly linked to COVID-19 vaccination, mostly involving myocarditis (2). Dr. Prasad was quoted as having written, “These deaths are related to vaccination (likely/probable/possible attribution made by staff). This is a profound revelation. For the first time, the FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children” (2).
Dr. Prasad was also quoted as having written, “I remain open to vigorous discussions and debate on these topics, as I have always been. I am open minded to modifications or alterations” (1).
Additional reporting noted that the memo did not include critical details like (as mentioned above) the specific ages of the children or their prior medical conditions, nor did it mention which vaccine products they received or autopsy findings (1,5). The absence of
How does this align with CDC’s vaccine safety monitoring and recommendations?
In its September 2025 meeting, the CDC’s ACIP met to review updated data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, immunization schedules, and safety signals. The 2025–2026 COVID-19 vaccination guidance was issued at that meeting under a “shared clinical decision-making” framework, meaning that vaccination is recommended based on individual risk-benefit assessments rather than universally (4).
In the committee’s deliberations, one workgroup flagged “serious safety uncertainties,” including potential myocarditis risk after messenger RNA vaccination, concerns that the group said were not fully addressed under current pharmacovigilance systems (6). The group also indicated that reliable quantifications of vaccine benefit across subpopulations remain elusive, particularly in people at lower risk for severe COVID-19 (6).
That said, however, the CDC has noted that COVID-19 vaccination substantially reduces risk for severe disease, hospitalization, and death in both adults and younger populations, especially for those at higher risk (7).
What are the potential impacts on vaccine development and the broader industry?
Expected impacts include:
- Stricter regulatory requirements. If FDA formalizes new standards inspired by the memo, such as requiring larger safety datasets, longer follow-up periods, and more detailed adverse-event investigation, including autopsies, vaccine developers may face higher costs, longer development times, and greater complexity in trial design (1).
- Hesitancy and demand uncertainty. Given the lack of clarity and the public attention to death claims, demand for pediatric vaccination may decline, and companies may deprioritize pediatric or broad-market vaccines in favor of adult-only or high-risk group vaccines (8).
- Shifts in public-health strategy. Regulators and public health bodies may revisit the once-routine practice of concomitant vaccination (e.g.,
giving multiple shots in one visit). If simultaneous immunization becomes restricted, scheduling logistics and patient compliance may become more challenging (9). - Regulatory precedent. This episode may set a precedent for how safety signals, even when not fully confirmed, can be used to reshape regulatory frameworks, which may then influence the broader future of biologics and vaccine approvals (10).
FDA’s internal memo, coupled with CDC’s review of data, points to the biopharma industry and public health experts grappling with the issue of whether, ultimately, this move is a necessary tightening of safeguards or a politicized overreaction that could hinder vaccine innovation and public trust (11).
References
1. Herper, M.; Branswell, H.
2. Reuters.
3. Lovelace Jr., B.
4. US Department of Health and Human Services.
5. Breen, K.; Brennan, M.; Gounder, C.
6. Levi, R.
7. CDC.
8. El-Deiry, W.; Kuperwasser, C.
9. CDC.
10. Su, J.
11. Nahum, A.; Drekonja, D. M.; Alpern, J. D. The Erosion of Public Trust and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines—More Action Is Needed. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8 (2), ofaa657. DOI:
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of biopharmaceutical innovation—subscribe to BioPharm International for expert insights on drug development, manufacturing, compliance, and more.





