In addition, auditable systems must show which databases were queried, what results were returned, and whether the process succeeded. Such systems are nearing adoption for real-world decisions and already support research direction, data gap identification, and testing prioritization.
Insilica’s Dr Luechtefeld Discusses Moving Computational Toxicology Beyond Predictive Models
At PharmSci 360, Insilica CEO Thomas Luechtefeld will present on auditable agentic AI systems and how they are expanding computational toxicology beyond single predictive models.
In an interview with BioPharm International® ahead of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists’s (AAPS) 2026
Dr Luechtefeld explains that
Dr Luechtefeld says
"It's going to be more and more important that people can trace information, trace decision making, and ground everything to truth," Dr Luechtefeld asserts.
Why are single predictive models no longer enough for toxicology decisions?
Dr Luechtefeld points out that the computational models that dominated the past decade are becoming a smaller part of a larger ecosystem. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and molecular simulation retain value, he explains, but the decision context must broaden. When extensive experimental data exist for a chemical, he adds, those data should inform the decision rather than a QSAR prediction.
In addition, auditable systems must show which databases were queried, what results were returned, and whether the process succeeded, Dr Luechtefeld says. Such systems are nearing adoption for real-world decisions and already support research direction, data gap identification, and testing prioritization, he emphasizes. He expects significant changes within 1 to 2 years in how toxicology teams work.
About the speaker
Thomas Luechtefeld, PhD, Founder and CEO, Insilica
Dr Luechtefeld earned his PhD in Environmental Health Sciences from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where he developed RASAR, a machine learning approach to read-across that reached 87% balanced accuracy across nine OECD test types and 190,000 chemicals, exceeding the reproducibility of the animal tests against which the RASAR approach was benchmarked. Dr Luechtefeld’s work is funded by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, an FDA research contract, and Horizon Europe, including the ONTOX program for non-animal methods. He recently opened ToxIndex to academic and regulatory researchers at no cost.
Related to this article









