
Anti-PD-1 Therapies: Immune to Pricing Wars?
Although competing therapies will continue to be released in the immune-oncology space, efficacy profiles, combination regimens, and administration setting may influence a drug’s preferred status more than price.
Opdivo (nivolumab) and Keytruda (pembrolizumab), which were
The focal point of competition lies in Opdivo’s response rate for melanoma, which was shown in clinical trials to be better than that of Keytruda’s; BMS said in a
Some analysts and sources closely watching these two therapies predict that both Keytruda and Opdivo-which cost $150,000 per patient per year-may jumpstart a pricing war similar to what was recently seen with Gilead’s Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) and Harvoni (ledipasvir and sofosbuvir). Because oncology treatments are extremely personalized, however, a pharmacy benefits manager such as Express Scripts may not be as quick to cut a deal with a drug manufacturer to selectively offer one of these cancer treatments over the other.
A key factor that may differentiate the success of each drug is the approval timeframes for additional indications. Early data presented at the 56th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting
In addition to Hodgkin’s lymphoma, BMS is testing Opdivo for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and solid tumors. BMS will also evaluate the combination of Opdivo and monoclonal antibody FPA008 as a potential treatment option for patients with
Merck received
Although access to Opdivo and Keytruda will be closely monitored, Leerink analyst Seamus Fernandez
Opdivo may also gain the upper hand if it can achieve first-line treatment status. BMS and Ono Pharmaceutical are
Sources:
BMS
Merck
Medical Marketing & Media
Forbes
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of biopharmaceutical innovation—subscribe to BioPharm International for expert insights on drug development, manufacturing, compliance, and more.