Novo Nordisk reported headline results from the ZEUS cardiovascular outcomes phase 3 trial, reporting that ziltivekimab did not reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with placebo in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and inflammation (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.11), despite demonstrating target engagement and inhibition of the IL-6 pathway.1
"Although ziltivekimab produced the expected biological effect, this did not result in MACE benefits in this population," said Martin Holst Lange, MD, PhD, executive vice president, chief scientific officer, and head of research and development at Novo Nordisk, in a company press release.1 "While ziltivekimab did not achieve the MACE benefit we had hoped for, this does not change our strategic commitment to cardiovascular disease."
Key facts
- ZEUS trial: ziltivekimab did not reduce MACE risk vs. placebo (HR 0.99)
- Trial enrolled >6300 people with ASCVD, CKD, and inflammation
- Ziltivekimab confirmed IL-6 pathway engagement despite no MACE benefit
- Higher serious infection rate with ziltivekimab; no mortality difference
- HERMES and ARTEMIS trials continue, readout expected 1H 2027
- Non-cash impairment charge expected in Q3 2026; 2026 profit outlook unaffected
What was the ZEUS trial designed to test?
ZEUS was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling more than 6300 people with ASCVD, CKD, and inflammation, defined as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels of 2 mg/L or higher.1,2 The trial evaluated once-monthly subcutaneous ziltivekimab, 15 mg, versus placebo on top of standard of care, with MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal heart attack, or non-fatal stroke, as the primary endpoint.1,2
What did the results show?
Ziltivekimab produced expected reductions in free interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hsCRP, confirming target engagement, but this biological effect did not translate into a reduction in MACE risk relative to placebo.1 Full results from the trial are expected to be presented at a scientific meeting later in 2026.
How did ziltivekimab perform on safety?
Overall rates of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between the ziltivekimab and placebo groups, according to the company. A higher proportion of people treated with ziltivekimab experienced serious infections compared with placebo, a finding the company said is consistent with IL-6 pathway inhibition. No difference in all-cause mortality was observed between groups.1