News|Articles|November 6, 2026

Amgen Real-World Study Links Evolocumab to Lower Heart Attack Risk Than Ezetimibe

Key Takeaways

  • A large real-world analysis found evolocumab reduced the risk of fatal or nonfatal heart attack by 20% compared with ezetimibe.
  • The study drew on de-identified data from more than 544,000 US adults with ASCVD and prior statin use.
SHOW MORE

A real-world study found evolocumab cut fatal or nonfatal heart attack risk 20% vs ezetimibe in adults with ASCVD and prior statin use.

Amgen announced on November 5, 2026, results from a large real-world study showing that evolocumab (Repatha) reduced the risk of fatal or nonfatal heart attacks by 20% compared with ezetimibe in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and prior statin use.¹ The study followed more than 544,000 adults for up to 4 years and was published in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.¹,²

Key facts

  • Drug: evolocumab (Repatha; Amgen)
  • Class: PCSK9 inhibitor monoclonal antibody
  • Comparator: ezetimibe
  • Study: real-world, active-comparator, new-user cohort (Komodo Healthcare Map)
  • Population: 544,103 adults with ASCVD and prior statin use
  • Groups: 64,421 evolocumab; 479,682 ezetimibe (2017-2024)
  • Primary outcome: fatal or nonfatal MI over up to 4 years
  • Result: 20% lower MI risk (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91)
  • Publication: American Journal of Preventive Cardiology

"These findings provide important comparative data that can help clinicians distinguish between these treatment options and make more informed choices to reduce their patients' cardiovascular risk," said Nihar Desai, MD, MPH, associate professor of medicine and vice chief of the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine at Yale University School of Medicine, in a company press release.¹

What did the study find?

Treatment with evolocumab lowered the rate of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) compared with ezetimibe (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91).¹,² Among the 225,048 patients with a baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement, the 4-year cumulative risk of heart attack was 5.88% with evolocumab vs 7.76% with ezetimibe.¹

How was the study designed?

The non-interventional, active-comparator, new-user cohort study applied a target trial framework intended to mirror a randomized clinical trial, comparing adults with ASCVD and prior statin use who initiated evolocumab or ezetimibe in routine US clinical care.² It drew on de-identified data from the Komodo Healthcare Map database, including 64,421 adults who initiated evolocumab and 479,682 who initiated ezetimibe between 2017 and 2024, with follow-up through June 2026.² The primary outcome was fatal or nonfatal MI over up to 4 years.²

To account for differences between the groups, the researchers used inverse probability weighting to balance measured baseline characteristics and a calibrated estimator to address incomplete baseline LDL-C data.² A prespecified sensitivity analysis that continued follow-up regardless of changes in background statin therapy produced consistent results.²

Why does the comparison matter?

Many patients with ASCVD cannot reach recommended LDL-C levels with statins alone, and clinicians add a non-statin therapy as a next step.¹ According to Amgen, direct cardiovascular outcomes evidence comparing ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors has been limited, even as guidelines target LDL-C goals below 70 mg/dL and below 55 mg/dL for higher-risk patients.¹ Amgen positioned the analysis as a real-world complement to clinical trial evidence that may inform treatment decisions.¹

How does Repatha work?

Evolocumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9).¹ By blocking PCSK9 from binding to the LDL receptor, it increases the number of receptors available to clear LDL from the blood, lowering LDL-C levels.¹ In the randomized FOURIER trial, evolocumab added to statin therapy reduced cardiovascular events in patients with established ASCVD.³ According to Amgen, the ACC/AHA multisociety guideline update recognizes both ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors such as evolocumab as non-statin options for patients with ASCVD.¹

Repatha was first approved in 2015.¹ In August 2025, FDA broadened its approved use to include adults at increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events due to uncontrolled LDL-C, and in August 2026 the European Commission approved an expanded ASCVD indication based on the phase 3 VESALIUS-CV trial, which found that evolocumab reduced first major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.¹,⁴

What are the limitations?

As an observational analysis, the study cannot establish causation, and residual confounding may remain despite the statistical methods used to balance the groups. A baseline LDL-C measurement was available for about 41% of participants, and the study was conducted by Amgen's Center for Observational Research. The analysis did not compare evolocumab with other lipid-lowering options, and it reflects US clinical practice, which may limit generalizability.

References

  1. Amgen. Repatha lowers risk of heart attacks by 20% compared with ezetimibe in a large real-world study. News release. November 5, 2026. Accessed November 6, 2026. https://www.amgen.com/newsroom/press-releases/2026/11/repatha-lowers-risk-of-heart-attacks-by-20-compared-with-ezetimibe-in-a-large-realworld-study
  2. Desai N, Jin R, Hurwitz K, et al. Real-world comparative effectiveness of evolocumab versus ezetimibe in adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: an active-comparator new-user study. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2026;
    102577. doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2026.102577
  3. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713-1722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615664
  4. Marston NA, Bohula EA, Bhatia AK, et al. Evolocumab to reduce first major cardiovascular events in patients without known significant atherosclerosis and with diabetes: results from the VESALIUS-CV trial. JAMA. 2026;335(16):1400-1407. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.3277

Related to this article