Quality/GMPs

Latest News


Digitalization of QbD Risk Assessments

The digital transformation of quality-by-design assessment workflows can improve efficiency, reduce human errors, and facilitate integration within a much broader digital ecosystem.

Digitalization of QbD Risk Assessments

Subjectivity in Quality Risk Management

The authors discuss subjectivity in the ICH Q9 (R1) guidance document.

Subjectivity in Quality Risk Management

Phase-appropriate Compliance for Cell and Gene Therapies

Understanding how to apply phase-appropriate GMPs is crucial for achieving successful regulatory approval.

Phase-appropriate Compliance for Cell and Gene Therapies

i1-304816-1408681589924.jpg

The Food and Drug Administration's Prescription Drug User Fee program (PDUFA) has to be reauthorized by Oct. 1, 2007, and all the interested parties are fine-tuning their wish lists for "improvements." Although some consumer advocates and their Congres-sional allies blast user fees for extending industry control over the drug approval process, FDA officials, pharma companies, and patient disease groups applaud the program's success in ending "drug lag" and speeding new drugs and biotech therapies to market.

i1-304818-1408681585695.jpg

Human infections with avian flu strain H5N1 are occurring in a number of southeast Asian countries that have experienced large outbreaks of avian influenza. How great a risk to the human population is posed by this virus, and what steps can be taken to minimize its impact? Preventive vaccines have great potential to avert the spread of avian flu and other infectious diseases. What are the factors affecting the creation of new vaccines, and how can they be optimized to promote public health?

Cleaning validation is a critical consideration in the pharmaceutical industry. Inadequate cleaning can result in contamination of drug products with bacteria, endotoxins, active pharmaceuticals from previous batch runs, and cleaning solution residues. Such contaminants must be reduced to safe levels, both for regulatory approval and to ensure patient safety.

i1-284443-1408687976861.jpg

Andrew von Eschenbach, acting commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), says that implementing the Critical Path Initiative is "one of my highest priorities," and is encouraging more FDA collaboration with other government agencies, academia, and industrial partners to find better ways to encourage innovation. As head of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Von Eschenbach has supported joint projects with FDA to spur development of new cancer drugs, including efforts to qualify biomarkers for cancer detection in specific patient populations and to examine how imaging technologies can monitor the impact of therapies on cancer tumors.

i1-197387-1408689030006.jpg

Achieving approval of a new pharmacologic agent or device on a worldwide basis is a significant challenge. The guidelines and requirements that steer our efforts at enhancing and extending life around the world are tedious and, fortunately, comprehensive. In spite of relatively few setbacks, perhaps in no other category than pharmaceutical development are the advantages of these guidelines more evident.

Operating costs are the white-hot issue in the boardrooms of our life sciences clients and they tend to rule the site selection process. A soft economy, worldwide trade competition, drug cost containment pressures from the US government, and a lean and mean message sent by the venture capital community mean that quantitative factors that focus on the cost of doing business are trumping qualitative lifestyle factors, especially when evaluating sites for a new biopharmaceutical facility.

Many industry professionals know that analytical testing for biopharmaceuticals for all raw materials, production in-process stages, and final containers must be validated, and they generally understand how this can be achieved. Many of us even understand the basic concepts of laboratory compliance and production process quality. However, how exactly are analytical test method performance and process robustness related and how do they depend on each other? Furthermore, how do we monitor and maintain the accuracy and reliability of analytical methods long after validation completion to ensure the suitability of these methods for measuring process quality?