In an about-face capping a tumultuous week that included the announcement of layoffs of more than a third of its workforce, Cambridge, Mass.-based Sarepta Therapeutics said on the evening of July 21, 2025 that it would pause shipments of delandistrogene moxeparvovec, a treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy marketed as Elevidys, in the United States as of the close of business on July 22 (1,2).
Three deaths prompt action
Key Takeaways
- Sarepta paused US shipments of Elevidys after FDA linked three patient deaths to liver failure potentially caused by its AAVrh74-based gene therapy.
- FDA halted Sarepta's LGMD trials, revoked AAVrh74 platform status, and narrowed Elevidys’ indication to ambulatory patients due to safety concerns.
- Concurrent with a $400 million cost-cutting plan, Sarepta is shifting focus from gene therapies to siRNA programs while maintaining select Duchenne-related products.
For Sarepta, it is a stunning and humbling reversal after the company defied FDA on Friday, July 18, by refusing to voluntarily suspend shipments of Elevidys at the agency’s request following three deaths, apparently due to acute liver failure, which FDA traced back to delandistrogene moxeparvovec treatments or investigational gene therapy using the same serotype, AAVrh74, found in the drug (3,4).
In light of those developments, FDA at the time of its request also placed Sarepta’s investigational gene therapy clinical trials for limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) on hold and revoked the platform technology designation for AAVrh74 (3). According to the Muscular Dystrophy Association, LGMD typically manifests in the proximal muscles, nearest the hips and shoulders; while Duchenne muscular dystrophy primarily affects the same muscle groups, its early childhood onset and overwhelming prevalence in male patients versus female have given it increased focus (5).
“We’ve shown that this FDA takes swift action when patient safety is at risk,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, MD, said on July 18 (3). “We believe in access to drugs for unmet medical needs but are not afraid to take immediate action when a serious safety signal emerges.”
“Protecting patient safety is our highest priority, and FDA will not allow products whose harms are greater than benefits,” Vinay Prasad, MD, director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, added (3). “FDA will halt any clinical trial of an investigational product if clinical trial participants would be exposed to an unreasonable and significant risk of illness or injury.”