Register Now: From Clinical to Commercial: Accelerating ADC Late-Stage Development with Technology Innovation and Integrated Platform
|Articles|May 17, 2011

FDA Issues Guidance on Bioequivalence Studies

This month, FDA issued a new guidance for industry concerning the submission of summary bioequivalence data for abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). The guidance is meant to clarify the requirements for the submission of bioequivalence data that were published in 2009 (1). Federal regulations require that all bioequivalence studies performed for a given agent be submitted as part of the ANDA, regardless of whether the study confirms that the product is equivalent to the reference listed drug (RLD).

This month, FDA issued a new guidance for industry concerning the submission of summary bioequivalence data for abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). The guidance is meant to clarify the requirements for the submission of bioequivalence data that were published in 2009 (1). Federal regulations require that all bioequivalence studies performed for a given agent be submitted as part of the ANDA, regardless of whether the study confirms that the product is equivalent to the reference listed drug (RLD).

FDA believes that review of both positive and negative data may be “important in our determination of whether a product is bioequivalent to the RLD and are relevant to our evaluation of generic products in general,” according to the guidance. “These data will increase our understanding of generic drug development and how changes in components and composition may affect formulation performance, as well as promote further development of science-based bioequivalence policies,” says the guidance.

The guidance consists of two sections. The first section clarifies what types of ANDAs must include all bioequivalence studies and specifies the necessary format for a summary report. The second section clarifies what the meaning of “the same product formulation” for immediate-release drug forms, extended-release drug products, semisolid dosage forms, and other complex dosage forms. This section also contains examples of slightly different formulations that would be considered the same product, and of other formulations that would be considered different.

Reference

  • FDA, “Requirements for Submission of Bioequivalence Data; Final Rule.” Fed. Regist.74(11), 2849–2862 (Jan. 16, 2009).

Related to this article

The BioPharm Brief: FDA Designations for a Bispecific CAR-T, a BLA for Friedreich’s Ataxia, and Phase 2b MASH Data for Efinopegdutide
FDA grants RMAT and Fast Track designations to AbelZeta’s CD20/CD19 bispecific CAR-T prizlon-cel in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma, Larimar Therapeutics completes a BLA seeking accelerated approval of nomlabofusp for Friedreich’s ataxia, and Merck’s GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist efinopegdutide meets its primary endpoint in a phase 2b MASH trial.