
California State Senate Passes Biosimilars Bill
Following passage in the California Assembly, the California State Senate passes legislation to specify requirements for dispensing biosimilars.
Following passage by the California Assembly in late August, the California State Senate has passed a biosimilar bill (
The bill, which amends California’s state pharmacy law, specifies that a pharmacist filling a prescription order for a prescribed biological product may select a biosimilar only if the product is approved by FDA, has been determined to be interchangeable with prescribed biologic, and the prescriber (i.e., the doctor) does not personally indicate “do not substitute” for the product. For prescriptions filled prior to Jan. 1, 2017 for a biological product or interchangeable biosimilar, the pharmacist must notifiy the prescriber (i.e., doctor) whether the prescription dispensed was a biological product or interchangeable biosimilar or enter the information in a patient-record system shared by the prescriber. The bill also prohibits a pharmacist from selecting a biosimilar unless the cost is the same or less than the cost of the prescribed biological product. The bill further requires that the substitution of a biosimilar be communicated to the patient.
Jim Greenwood, president and CEO of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO),
In January 2013, BIO issued its “
Ralph G. Neas, president and CEO of the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA), voiced the group's opposition to the legislation and urged California’s governor to veto the measure in a Sept. 4, 2013
As of August 2013, four states–Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and North Dakota, have passed legislation specifying requirements for biosimilars although the measures in Oregon, Utah, and Virginia contain sunset provisions,
For related stories, see the following:
Sources:
Related to this article









