Drug shortages are declining, but they’re still a serious concern for regulatory authorities, policy makers, and bio/pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Drug shortages are declining, but they’re still a serious concern for regulatory authorities, policy makers, and bio/pharmaceutical manufacturers. FDA officials reported that there were less than 40 new drug shortages last year, down from more than 250 in 2011. The agency noted that it was able to prevent nearly 80 short supply situations in 2014, largely due to enhanced communication with manufacturers that helped regulators identify alternative sources and assist firms in addressing supply and production problems.
Limited supplies of crucial medical products, however, continue to plague the United States healthcare system and make headlines when patients can’t access shortages involve crucial, lifesaving medicines, particularly widely used sterile injectables. The Canadian government unveiled new requirements for manufacturers to announce shortage situations, noting that its voluntary disclosure system was not sufficient. GlaxoSmithKline’s recall and resulting shortage in Nicorette lozenges drew cries of outrage from former smokers.
The ongoing drug shortage crisis has generated numerous advisories for how biopharma manufacturers should address the drug quality and production problems that appear to underlie most serious supply situations. The Pew Charitable Trusts recently published a report on an August 2014 Drug Shortages Summit that urges manufacturers to improve supply sourcing, and also calls on health plans and hospitals to pay more for quality products.
Risk-based approach
The Pew report further offers strategies for biopharma manufacturers to improve production systems and tighten contracts with suppliers. More specific is a new technical report from the Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), which outlines a risk-based approach for companies to assess the impact on patients of a disruption in drug supplies and the factors making it likely that such a situation will arise. If a drug shortage would limit access to a treatment for a life threatening condition and if no alternative therapies are available, then the situation would be ranked as high-risk and warrant more company investment in safeguards and preventive strategies.
The report’s “risk triage model” further considers factors likely to lead to a shortage, such as the strength of established system controls, ingredient sourcing (multiple or single supplier), inventory levels, and process capability. Companies should develop drug shortage prevention and response plans for every product, including the need to seek expedited approval of postmarketing changes that may help avoid shortages over a product’s lifecycle.
For certain high-risk situations, a manufacturer may look to add manufacturing sites or lines, engage additional raw material suppliers, or install new equipment and technology. Manufacturers should identify appropriate inventory levels based on state of controls and the need for multisourcing strategies. And plans should address methods for communicating with health authorities, distribution channels, and users about shortage risks.
Shortage prevention related to high-risk situations may warrant upgrades in aging production facilities and investment in new analytical technologies. The advisors note the value of adopting single-use process technology to replace obsolete equipment, but also recognize that less dramatic upgrades may improve operations, reduce costs, and help avoid process or facility failures. “Enhanced redundancy” may be achieved through approval of an additional manufacturing site or line, as well as added raw material and API suppliers, container/closure components, and dosage forms.
PDA’s technical report is the product of more than two years of deliberations by PDA members through a series of workshops, proposals, and comments. It aims to assist senior management at bio/pharmaceutical companies ensure continued supply of approved medicines and development of a “robust quality culture” to support quality improvement, ensure compliance with manufacturing standards, and foresee and avoid shortage situations.
Regeneron Treatment for Multiple Myeloma Gets Conditional Marketing Approval from EC
April 29th 2025The indication is specific to patients who have received at least three prior therapies, including a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory agent, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.
MHRA Approves GSK Therapy Combinations for Multiple Myeloma
April 21st 2025Belantamab mafodotin is approved in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone in patients who have had at least one prior therapy, and in combination with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone for those who have had a prior therapy including lenalidomide.