Study Finds Candidate for Universal Flu Vaccine Protects Against Multiple Strains

Sep 06, 2018
By BioPharm International Editors

Research from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania suggests that a universal flu vaccine that protects people against most influenza strains is one step closer to reality.

In the study, published on Aug. 22, 2018 in the journal Nature Communications, the candidate vaccine elicited a strong antibody response to a structure on the surface of flu viruses called the hemagglutinin (HA) stalk. The university reports that the vaccine protected mice from infection by various flu strains.

Despite the widespread use of seasonal vaccines, flu viruses in the United States cause millions of infections, hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations, and tens of thousands of deaths each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Penn Medicine reports that the new vaccine has the potential to be developed into a universal flu vaccine, which unlike the current seasonal flu vaccines, could be given a few times over a lifetime to provide protection potentially similar to a tetanus vaccine.

“This vaccine was able to do something that most other candidate flu vaccines have not been able to do,” said study co-senior author Drew Weissman, MD, PhD, a professor of Infectious Diseases, in an Aug. 22, 2018 press release. “It was able to elicit protective responses against a conserved region that offers broad protection.”

“If it works in humans even half as well as it does in mice, then the sky’s the limit—it could be something that everyone uses in the future to protect themselves from the flu,” said co-senior author Scott Hensley, PhD, an associate professor of Microbiology.

“Modern viral vaccines typically use lab-grown viral proteins to elicit an immune response that protects people against future exposures to a virus,” Penn Medicine stated in the release. “On the whole, this approach hasn’t worked well against influenza viruses. Flu virus particles are studded with mushroom-like HA proteins, which seasonal flu vaccines use to elicit antibody responses. The problem is that these antibody responses are almost entirely directed against the outermost ‘head’ region of the HA protein, which tends to mutate rapidly. In addition, strains of flu that are prevalent in one flu season are often replaced by other strains with different HA head structures in the next flu season. As a result, seasonal flu vaccines provide incomplete and temporary protection against the flu. This is why they need to be updated every year.”

The Penn vaccine does not directly use flu HA proteins; it uses mRNA molecules that encode HA proteins to elicit an antibody response. The researchers report that when injected into a recipient, these RNAs are taken up by immune system dendritic cells and translated into copies of the HA protein by the protein-making machinery within those cells. This in-cell production of viral proteins does a better job of mimicking a real flu infection and elicits a powerful protective antibody response, according to the researchers.

This response included antibodies against the lower stalk region of the HA. This area has been a favored target for universal flu vaccines because it does not vary from one flu subtype to another. Seasonal vaccines that use HA proteins normally do not elicit much of a response to the HA stalk, but two injections of the Penn scientists’ mRNA vaccine, four weeks apart, produced a robust anti-stalk response in the mice.

The team observed that after immunization, these strong antibody responses to the vaccine persisted through the 30 weeks of the experiment. At the end of this period, the anti-stalk responses were even stronger than they had been four weeks after immunization. In addition to the mice, the researchers successfully repeated these experiments in ferrets and rabbits, other species commonly used as vaccine-development animal models.

Having established that the mRNA vaccine can elicit a strong antibody response, including an anti-stalk response, the scientists showed that this response protects mice from infection with influenza. A vaccine encoding the H1 subtype kept mice healthy when they were injected with otherwise lethal doses of three flu strains: the same H1 flu virus, a distantly related H1 flu virus, and an H5 strain.

“The next step is to test this in non-human primates and humans,” Hensley commented.

mRNA vaccine technology is relatively new but has already been demonstrated in other settings. The mRNA molecules used in these vaccines are modified so that they cannot be recognized by cells as foreign RNAs, which otherwise would trigger an immune reaction that would hamper the vaccine’s effectiveness. The modified mRNAs are also encapsulated in tiny fat-like spheres called lipid nanoparticles, which help them travel to target cells after being injected.

The researchers believe that because of how easy it is to make modified mRNAs, vaccines based on them could include modified-mRNA molecules encoding multiple viral proteins, for example, multiple HA subtypes, to broaden their effectiveness.

“If we were to combine our vaccine approach with newly developed HA stalk antigens, it would probably lead to a really good universal vaccine,” Weissman said in the release. The team hopes to begin clinical trials within two years, adding that large-scale production of mRNA should be simple, as a single reaction is used to make any mRNA followed by a single reaction to make the lipid nanoparticles.

The first authors of the study were Norbert Pardi and Kaela Parkhouse, respectively of the Weissman and Hensley Laboratories. The other co-authors are Ericka Kirkpatrick, Meagan McMahon, Seth Zost, Barbara Mui, Ying Tam, Katalin Karikó, Christopher Barbosa, Thomas Madden, Michael Hope, and Florian Krammer. The study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Source: Penn Medicine

native1_300x100
lorem ipsum