Designing in Quality: Approaches to Defining the Design Space for a Monoclonal Antibody Process - How to use risk assessment strategies to integrate operations. - BioPharm International

ADVERTISEMENT

Designing in Quality: Approaches to Defining the Design Space for a Monoclonal Antibody Process
How to use risk assessment strategies to integrate operations.


BioPharm International
Volume 23, Issue 5

Risk Assessment for Prioritization


Figure 2
A typical monoclonal antibody (MAb) manufacturing process involves >20 distinct unit operations with >200 process parameters, and more than 50 different raw materials, making the complexity level significantly higher than that of a small-molecule drug. Therefore, a clear and efficient strategy is required to identify high-risk process parameters for process characterization.


Figure 3
A multidisciplinary team consisting of representatives from the quality, process development, regulatory, manufacturing, and analytical groups actively participates in the risk-assessment process, using data and knowledge from various sources, including previous development, platform process knowledge, manufacturing data from relevant bioprocesses, and literature information. The inputs for risk assessments are summarized in Figure 2. The output from the risk-assessment exercise is captured in a "process understanding plan."


Table 1. "Cause/Effect" matrix (abbreviated) for an upstream focus area. The scale is 1 to 10, with 10 being the most significant.
The process for risk assessment leading to experiment prioritization is illustrated in Figure 3. Based on equipment and operation similarity, the process was segmented into various focus areas with defined boundaries. For each focus area, the relevant quality attributes are ranked according to a predefined scale (1 to 10). Then, the effect of each process parameter on every relevant quality attribute is assessed using a predefined scale (1 to 10). Based on this ranking, a cumulative score is calculated for each parameter. This score represents the relative importance of the parameter for the focus area and is used to prioritize experiments.


Table 2. "Cause/Effect" matrix (abbreviated) for a downstream focus area. The scale is 1 to 10, with 10 being the most significant.
Tables 1 and 2 provide two abbreviated examples of a "cause and effect matrix" for an upstream cell culture and a downstream purification process. The examples include the rankings for quality attributes as well as the rankings of the impact of process parameters on quality attributes. The parameters are ranked based on the calculated scores.


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

Moscow Hosts IFPMA Biosimilars Conference
May 17, 2013
AbbVie and Alvine Will Collaborate on Celiac Disease Therapy
May 15, 2013
FDA Issues Pharmacoepidemiologic Safety Study Guidance
May 14, 2013
USP Launches Initiative to Fight Counterfeit Drugs in Sub-Saharan Africa
May 13, 2013
Amgen Forms New Joint Venture to Commercialize Vectibix in China
May 13, 2013
Upcoming Conferences
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

Access Programs for Investigational and Pre-Launch Drugs
Philadelphia, PA | July 17-18, 2013
Request Brochure

Strategic Pipeline Planning & Portfolio Valuation
Philadelphia, PA | August 13-14, 2013
Request Brochure

MES 2013 - Forum on Manufacturing Execution Systems
Philadelphia, PA | August 14-15, 2013
Request Brochure

Mobile Innovation for the Life Sciences Industry
Philadelphia, PA | August 20-21, 2013
Request Brochure

See All Conferences >>

ADVERTISEMENT

Author Guidelines
FindPharma
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here