Comparison of Camelid Antibody Ligand to Protein A for Monoclonal Antibody Purification - A stable alternative to Protein A chromatography. - BioPharm International

ADVERTISEMENT

Comparison of Camelid Antibody Ligand to Protein A for Monoclonal Antibody Purification
A stable alternative to Protein A chromatography.


BioPharm International
Volume 22, Issue 9

Comparison of Adsorption Isotherm


Figure 3. Comparison of adsorption isotherms on MabSelect, IgSelect, and ProSep-vA resins at pH 7.0
Figure 3 shows the adsorption isotherms of Fc-fusion protein A at pH 7.0 for all the three resins. Table 1 lists the thermodynamic parameters (Q max and K). It shows that amongst the three resins, MabSelect had the highest Q max value, which was consistent with DBC results. On the other hand, Qmax for ProSep-vA was slightly lower than IgSelect even though their relative trend for dynamic binding capacity was opposite. This can be explained by improved flow properties for the glass-bead–based ProSep-vA resin, which causes its DBC to be closer to its equilibrium capacity. Furthermore, K values for all three resins were very similar, indicating that the binding strength for Protein A and this new ligand was very similar.

Comparison of Selectivity


Table 1. Langmuir Isotherm data at pH 7.0
As mentioned before, it has been shown in the literature that none of the small-molecule synthetic ligands developed as Protein A alternatives were able to provide the lock-and-key induced fit as Protein A.24,29 The non-specific binding of host cell proteins to these ligands have made their selectivity much lower than that of Protein A resins. On the other hand, the VHH fragment has the capability to recognize unique conformational epitope and hence has the promise of showing greater selectivity.


Figure 4. Log reduction value (LRV) of Chinese hamster ovary host cell proteins (CHOP) under preparative conditions on MabSelect, IgSelect, and ProSep-vA resins
To compare the selectivity of the new resin to Protein A, host cell protein clearance was compared for the four antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins using complex cell-culture fluid. The details of these preparative experiments are outlined in the experimental section. Protein recoveries for all of these experiments were comparable and >90%. The elution pools from these experiments were collected and analyzed for host cell protein (Chinese hamster ovary protein, CHOP) levels. Figure 4 plots the CHOP log reduction values (LRVs) from these experiments. The higher the LRV, the more selective is the resin. Figure 4 shows that IgSelect demonstrated comparable host cell protein clearance to the Protein A resins. In fact, for molecules A, B, and D, the LRV values for IgSelect were slightly lower or comparable to MabSelect but higher than the other Protein A resin ProSep-vA. ProSep resins are known to give slightly lower CHOP clearance than the agarose-based Protein A resins because of non-specific interactions of CHOP with their silica backbone.37 On the whole, the selectivity shown by this new camelid antibody resin appears to be very promising.


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

First Biosimilar Application Kicks Off Legal Battle
October 31, 2014
FDA Approves Pfizer's Trumenba for the Prevention of Meningitis B
October 30, 2014
EMA: Extrapolation Across Indications for Biosimilars a Possibility
October 30, 2014
Bristol-Myers Squibb Announces Agreement to Acquire HER2-Targeted Cancer Treatment
October 29, 2014
Amgen, Sanofi, and Ono Pharmaceuticals Partner with Universities on Transmembrane Protein Research
October 28, 2014
Author Guidelines
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here