Analytical Method Development and Optimization - Validation of analytical methods can be more easily accomplished by breaking the task down into a series of planned steps. - BioPharm International

ADVERTISEMENT

Analytical Method Development and Optimization
Validation of analytical methods can be more easily accomplished by breaking the task down into a series of planned steps.


BioPharm International


References

1. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). Q2(R1), Validation of analytical procedures. Current Step 4 Version. Geneva, Switzerland; 2005.

2. Eurachem Guide. Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods. Teddington, UK; 1998.

3. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry. Bioanalytical Method Validation. Bethesda MD; 2001.

4. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Draft Guidance for Industry. Analytical procedures and methods validation. Bethesda, MD; 2000.

5. Muire-Sluis A. Presented at Biological Assay Development and Validation; 2004 Apr 26–28; San Diego, CA.

6. United States Pharmacopoeia. USP 30 <1225>. Validation of Compendial Methods. 2007.

7. Pharmacopoeial Forum 32 <1226> Verification of Comendial Test Procedures. PF, Vol 32 (4), July August 2006.

8. Schenerman MA, et al. CMC strategy forum report: analysis and structure characterization of monoclonal antibodies. BioProcess Int 2004;(2):42–53.

9. Lucy PK, Beri RG. Key considerations in process transfer. BioProcess International 2003;(8):36–43.

10. Nguyen LT, et al. Characterization methods for the physical stability of biopharmaceuticals. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2003;57(6):429–45.

11. ICH. Q6B, Specifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for biotechnological/biological products. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Geneva, Switzerland; 1999.

12. ICH. Q7A, Good manufacturing practice guide for active pharmaceutical ingredients. Draft Consensus Guideline. Geneva, Switzerland; 2000.

13. Capen R. Revising USP <111> Design and analysis of bio-assays: current status and future plans. Presented at Biological Assay Development and Validation; 2004 Apr 26–28; San Diego, CA.

14. Callahan J. New USP guidelines for parallelism. Presented at Biological Assay Development and Validation; 2004 Apr 26–28; San Diego, CA.

15. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM E 1488-02, Standard guide for statistical procedures to use in developing and applying test methods. West Conshohocken, PA; 2002.

16. ASTM. ASTM E 1169-02, Standard guide for conducting ruggedness tests. West Conshohocken, PA; 2002.

17. ASTM. ASTM D 4853-97, Standard guide for reducing test variability. West Conshohocken, PA; 1997.

18. ASTM. ASTM D 4854-95, Standard guide for estimating the magnitude of variability from expected sources in sampling plans. West Conshohocken, PA; 1995.

19. ASTM. ASTM D 4855–97, Standard practice for comparing test methods. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 1997.

20. Krause, SO, Validation of Analytical Methods for Biopharmaceuticals—A guide to risk-based validation and implementation strategies. PDA/DHI Publishing. Bethesda, MD; 2007 Apr.


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene Collaborate on Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen
August 20, 2014
USP Center in Ghana Receives International Lab Accreditation
August 15, 2014
USP Awards Analytical Research
August 15, 2014
FDA Warns about Fraudulent Ebola Treatments
August 15, 2014
Guilty Plea to Importing Illegal Cancer Drugs
August 15, 2014
Author Guidelines
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here