Facility Design: Simulation Methodology for Facility Design - How simulation software can be used effectively as a capacity planning and design tool. - BioPharm International

ADVERTISEMENT

Facility Design: Simulation Methodology for Facility Design
How simulation software can be used effectively as a capacity planning and design tool.


BioPharm International
Volume 20, Issue 6

MODEL SETUP


Figure 1
Setting up a model requires basic data about the product and process characteristics. A unique characteristic of these simulators is their capability to use spreadsheets as an input or output mechanism, so that changes in parameters can be made in a familiar format. Figure 1 shows a high-level model construction fed by the process times and rules specified in the spreadsheets.

There were multiple product types planned for the facility. Liquid products in either vials or syringes do not get processed through the lyos; they are formulated, filled, and then capped. An assumption was made that if lyophilized syringes were filled, there would be a separate loading system to the lyos. Lyophilized products in either vials or syringes go through all processes.

Some of the parameters to describe the process included:
  • Formulation times and rules: SIP is done before processing starts and formulation tanks are cleaned by the CIP system after completion. Formulation of the next batch may begin while the cleaning and changeover in filling is in progress. Maximum hold times were also a constraint in scheduling when to start formulation. Liquids batches had to be completed filling and capping within 24 hours of formulation completion. Lyophilized batches had to be in the lyos within 32 hours of formulation completion.
  • Filling and capping: Times were specified for VHP decontamination before a batch, and manual cleaning after and changeover times for different products. VHP decontamination took approximately eight hours, and had to be done within 24 hours prior to starting. Filling of a liquids batch could also not start until both the filling and capping lines were completed cleaning and changeover. Filling startup times included line purging, weight checks, bringing up to temperature, and also had some estimated yield loss. As shown in Figure 1, the number of both filling and capping lines were variable, from 1 to 3 each. Other key variables were the lines speeds (vials or syringes per minute) that the lines were run at.
  • Lyo systems: The number of systems was variable (4–6), as was the freeze dry time (3–5 days), size of shelves per lyo (33–58 square meters), and number of shelves. For example, capacity of a 40 square meter lyo was 58,000 vials, 16 shelves with 3,000 vials per shelf, or 1,450 vials per square meter. Similar decontamination rules before and a one-day cleaning process after applied to the lyos.
  • Carts and conveyor systems: For the robotic cart system, the number of carts, number of CIP systems, the track configuration, and the locations of the filling and capping lines were all parameters to be changed and tested. Liquids products were moved from filling to capping, bypassing the lyos. The track or conveyor layout dictated which lyos and sequence possible could be practical for loading and unloading. The conveyors were fixed and carts could not cross each other on a single track. Thus the flexibility to designate different sets of filling and capping lines dedicated to specific lyos was included. The filling, loading and unloading, and capping times varied by configuration also, since the distance varied. Therefore, scenarios included defined routings allowed, which defined how many lyos could be loaded or unloaded simultaneously; e.g., with six lyos, 3 & 3 indicates two simultaneously, one from any of the first three and one from any of the second three.

The carts and conveyor had similar cleaning and VHP decontamination rules. Carts used CIP systems, of which one or two were considered, and required decontamination before the next use. The fixed conveyor system had multiple zones possible (up to five considered), and the cleaning and de-contamination had to be done sequentially.

All processing rules and cleaning are dependent on having skilled people available at the times required. Early runs of the model showed a high dependency on crewing because of the asynchronous nature of events occurring. The flexibility to change crew sizes and scheduled days per week, shifts per day, and hours per shift was included.

EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES

The value add of using simulation becomes apparent when the overall process rules and variability that exists in the actual operation are added to the problem definition. The asynchronous nature of a complex system like this is impossible to "get your head around" all of the parameters without it.


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Compounding Pharmacy Issues Recall, But Challenges FDA Decision
July 22, 2014
AbbVie's Acquisition of Shire Could Save $8 Billion in Taxes
July 21, 2014
AstraZeneca Reveals Design for New Global R&D Center and Corporate Headquarters
July 18, 2014
AbbVie to Acquire Shire for $54.7 Billion
July 18, 2014
Particulate Matter Prompts Baxter's Recall of IV Solutions
July 17, 2014
Author Guidelines
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here