IP Briefs: Demystifying the Patent Reform Act and its Impact on Company IP Strategy - IP stakeholders should focus on both patent procurement and enforcement strategies to maintain harmony between IP

ADVERTISEMENT

IP Briefs: Demystifying the Patent Reform Act and its Impact on Company IP Strategy
IP stakeholders should focus on both patent procurement and enforcement strategies to maintain harmony between IP assets and company business strategy


BioPharm International
Volume 20, Issue 1

4. American Bar Association, Section of Intellectual Property Law, A Section White Paper: Agenda for 21st Century Patent Reform (September 16, 2005); Patent Act of 2005: Hearings on H.R. 2795 Before the Subcomm. on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property of the House Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of Gary Griswold, Past President of the American Intellectual Property Law Association); Hearings on Patent Law Reform: Patent Injunctions and Damages Before the Subcomm. on Intellectual Property of the Senate Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of J. Jeffrey Hawley, President, Intellectual Property Owners Association); Hearings on An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, the Patent Reform Act of 2005 Before the Subcomm. on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property of the House Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of Robert B. Chess, Executive Chairman, Nektar Therapeutics, Testifying on Behalf of The Biotechnology Industry Organization); Hearings on An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, the Patent Reform Act of 2005 Before the Subcomm. on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property of the House Judiciary Comm., 109th Cong. (2005) (statement of Philip S. Johnson, Chief Patent Counsel, Johnson & Johnson, Testifying on Behalf of The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America).

5. H.R. 2795. 109th Cong. 6 (2005).

6. Coalition for Patent Reform, Modifications to An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795. 109th Cong. Coalition Print 2005.

7. Hearing on An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, the Patent Reform Act of 2005, supra note 5 (statement of Philip S. Johnson).

8. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 F.Supp. 1116, 1120 (S.D.N.Y. 1970).

9. Imonex Services, Inc. v. W. H. Munzprufer Dietmar Trenner GmbH, 408 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

10. H.R. 2795. 109th Cong. 6 (2005).

11. Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, 109th Cong. 6 (July 26, 2005).

12. H.R. 2795, 109th Cong. 4 (2005).

13 See id. 5.

14. Id.

15. See id. 9.

16. Id.

17. Carella v. Starlight Arcdhery & Pro Line Co., 804 F.2d 135 (Fed. Cir. 1986).

18. See id. 9.

19. See id. 8.

20. See id. 4.

21. See id. 3.

22. Hearings on An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, the Patent Reform Act of 2005, supra note 5 (statement of Robert B. Chess); Hearings on An Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 2795, the Patent Reform Act of 2005, supra note 5 (statement of Philip S. Johnson).


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Suppliers Seek to Boost Single-Use Technology
August 21, 2014
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene Collaborate on Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen
August 20, 2014
USP Center in Ghana Receives International Lab Accreditation
August 15, 2014
USP Awards Analytical Research
August 15, 2014
FDA Warns about Fraudulent Ebola Treatments
August 15, 2014
Author Guidelines
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here