Outsourcing: Early Development Services Lead the Way - 2005 is shaping up as a big year for preclinical and clinical CROs, while contract manufacturers hope to see a reversal of a depressing four-year

ADVERTISEMENT

Outsourcing: Early Development Services Lead the Way
2005 is shaping up as a big year for preclinical and clinical CROs, while contract manufacturers hope to see a reversal of a depressing four-year trend.


BioPharm International


Strong industry prospects also drove a high level of merger and acquisition (M&A) activity during 2004. Buyers had several motivations, including broadening their service offerings and increasing capacity. Private equity firms were anxious to buy their way into the industry in the expectation that strong growth will drive up the value of their acquisitions in the next three to five years. The following deals were among the more important:

  • Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) acquired Inveresk Research Group (Edinburgh, Scotland) for $1.5 billion, in a deal that closed in October, creating a company with $1 billion in revenues and leadership positions in discovery and preclinical services. Now a serious rival to preclinical segment leader Covance, the deal gave Charles River presence in the clinical research segment.
  • SFBC International (Miami, FL) acquired PharmaNet (Princeton, NJ), a major provider of phase 2-4 clinical research services, for $245 million. PharmaNet generated estimated revenue of $125 million in 2004 and has a global network of offices. The acquisition makes SFBC a top ten CRO with $300 million in revenues. Earlier in 2004, SFBC acquired Taylor Technology (Princeton, NJ), a small but respected provider of bioanalytical testing services.
  • Omnicare (Covington, KY) acquired Clinimetrics (San Jose, CA) in December. Clinimetrics adds $40 million to Omnicare CRO's $125 million in revenues and could help kick-start Omnicare's CRO business, which has drifted with flat revenues and poor profits for several years.
  • I3 Research (Basking Ridge, NJ) acquired Statprobe (Ann Arbor, MI). Both CROs offer clinical research services.
  • WIL Research Laboratories (Ashland, OH), a preclinical CRO, was acquired from Great Lakes Chemical for $105 million by Behrman Capital, a private investment group.

There were several small deals involving companies offering manufacturing and development services, notably the acquisition of Laureate Pharma (Princeton, NJ) by Safeguard Scientifics. The activity will likely continue into 2005: as 2005 began, offering memoranda were circulating for at least two well-known CMC services providers.

This acquisition activity has accelerated the consolidation of the preclinical and clinical CRO segments. PharmSource estimates that the top eight providers of preclinical research services now account for more than 70% of the market's revenues, with another 50 to 100 companies fighting over the remaining 25 to 30%. In the preclinical segment, the top eight companies now account for about 65% of revenues, with 300 smaller CROs dividing up the remainder. Many of the largest CROs have organic growth rates (in other words, growth from new business, not acquisitions) in excess of 20%, indicating that the biggest CROs will dominate the industry even more in a few years.

MANUFACTURING GETTING BETTER For the most part, the contract manufacturing sector has not enjoyed the success of preclinical and clinical businesses. While early-stage process development and analytical services have been strong, providers of phase 3 and commercial manufacturing services have suffered weak demand and excess capacity. Both small and large molecule API manufacturers have been hurt by candidate failures, too much in-house capacity at major pharmaceutical companies and, increasingly, competition from providers in low-cost countries.

The situation seems to be beginning to improve for manufacturers. Business development executives at December's CPhI trade show indicated that demand, while not yet robust, was beginning to firm up from weak 2002 to 2004 levels. Mild optimism, rather than doom-and-gloom, was the mood.

FILL AND FINISH CAPACITY Biopharmaceutical companies looking for manufacturing capacity in Europe now have expanded options. Several major pharmaceutical companies are making excess capacity available, while one fulltime contract manufacturer is about to open a new facility.

The Roche Group is now offering contract manufacturing through a new subsidiary, Cenexi. The business is headquartered outside of Paris and offers manufacturing for tablets, liquids, and sterile injectables.

Another Switzerland-based pharmaceutical company, Novartis, has begun offering contract manufacturing of injectable products, including lyophilization, at its facility in Stein. The 270,000-ft2 facility has four fill lines with capacity for 32 million vials, five ampule lines with capacity for 150 million units, and seven freeze dryers with capacity up to 210 ft2.

Contract injectables manufacturer Federa (Brussels, Belgium), owned by Cardinal Health (Dublin, OH), is putting the finishing touches on a new, state-of-the-art manufacturing facility outside of Brussels. The new facility will be FDA-compliant, and it will focus exclusively on filling prefilled syringes, with capacity of 120 million syringes annually. It uses SCF ("sterile, clean and ready-to-fill") technology in its packaging lines, which reduces processing steps and labor requirements. It can handle components from all of the three major prefilled syringe suppliers, Becton-Dickinson, Schott, and Buender Glas. Its equipment matches that of Cardinal Health's other new prefilled syringe facility in Puerto Rico.


blog comments powered by Disqus

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Suppliers Seek to Boost Single-Use Technology
August 21, 2014
Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene Collaborate on Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen
August 20, 2014
USP Center in Ghana Receives International Lab Accreditation
August 15, 2014
USP Awards Analytical Research
August 15, 2014
FDA Warns about Fraudulent Ebola Treatments
August 15, 2014
Author Guidelines
Source: BioPharm International,
Click here