Many types of equipment in both manufacturing and laboratory areas are critical to a properly functioning pharmaceutical process.
The validation of laboratory equipment is not as clearly defined as the validation of equipment used directly in the production
of pharmaceutical products, which requires thorough validation in almost all situations.
Should My Laboratory Equipment Be Validated?
The evaluation should begin by determining the requirements of the end user, which are often defined in the User Requirements
Specifications (URS). Additionally, it is critical to consider the laboratory applications as well as the associated equipment.
Next, a risk analysis should be performed. Some types of equipment may seem less critical, but upon more thorough analysis,
their real importance is revealed.
Responsibility for complying with the appropriate industry standards ultimately falls on individual companies, divisions,
or departments. Failure to comply with current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs) or good laboratory practices (GLPs) can
have serious consequences, including regulatory restrictions — such as the inability to sell the product.
Validation reduces the risks of non-compliance with regulatory agencies. It also can reduce compulsory in-process controls
and testing. Validation is a means of improving procedures and final product quality. Rather than adding constraints imposed
by regulatory bodies, validation is a process for improving efficiency and quality that ultimately can lead to cost savings.
Table 1: Key Factors for Manufacturers' Validation Capabilities
Pharmaceutical companies are responsible for the qualification and validation of their equipment. As a result, they must be
able to justify choices concerning these procedures to a regulatory agency auditor. The documented evidence supporting these
choices is one of the fundamental requirements of validation. After all, validation is verifying and documenting with a high
degree of assurance that specific equipment will perform consistently according to predetermined specifications. The documented
evidence presented also must comply with cGMPs, incorporate preventive maintenance, and include a requalification schedule.
It is important that the pharmaceutical company works in conjunction with equipment suppliers to determine the appropriate
validation protocols as well as the frequency of requalification. A manufacturer's validation capabilities can be an indicator
of the quality of the equipment being supplied.
Water Purification Systems
To further discuss validation principles, a single system with downstream effects on manufacturing and testing processes will
be examined. The data in a laboratory is impacted by a variety of instruments, including water purification systems. If the
water system does not consistently produce purified water, the validity of the data from these instruments can be compromised.
When acquiring equipment, particular attention must be paid to the equipment suppliers' ability to provide either direct or
indirect help with equipment validation and qualification — even if the qualification will be performed by internal qualification
services. When choosing a water purification system that will be validated, it is important to consider more than just the
specifications of the water produced. Other equally important factors should be considered, such as the level of service provided
and the manufacturers' validation experience. In order to meet user requirement specifications and regulatory guidelines,
an equipment manufacturer that has implemented a comprehensive program must be chosen to ensure that their products can be
qualified. Evaluation should include consideration of the manufacturer's design, manufacturing process, quality controls,
traceability, documented evidence, training for users and service personnel, support for periodic maintenance, qualification,
requalification, and other factors (see Table 1).
Water purification systems are essential pieces of equipment in most pharmaceutical laboratories for drug production, drug
testing, and quality control applications. The quality of purified water used in these processes ultimately can affect the
quality of the final product. This is why organizations such as the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the European Pharmacopoeia
(EP) frequently state that water purification systems must be validated.