Stuck in Neutral
The contract manufacturing industry isn’t gaining market share. Could it be that the CMO business model is out of synch with the current realities of the bio/pharmaceutical industry?
PharmSource recently completed an analysis of the dose CMO industry’s share of new FDA approvals (1). Our research found that of the 90 new drug applications (NDAs) approved in 2013, 32 (36%) used CMOs for dose manufacture. This was below the 2004-2014 10-year average of 43%.
Outsourcing for both new molecular entities (NMEs) and non-NMEs was below the long-term average. Among NMEs, 41% were outsourced, compared to 47% for the 10-year average. For non-NMEs, just 32% were outsourced, well below the 10-year average of 40%.
The share of NDA approvals that are outsourced can vary widely from year to year. The share of NMEs that have been contract manufactured has ranged from just 37% in 2011 to 59% in 2008. Contract dose manufacturing of non-NMEs has ranged from 31% in 2011 and 2013 to as high as 60% in 2012.
Nevertheless, the data clearly suggest that contract dose manufacturing has largely plateaued in terms of its share of new product approvals at the 45% level over a sustained period. Why can’t the CMO industry break through to manufacture a greater share of drugs?
Rooted in an old reality
The old bio/pharmaceutical industry model was characterized by high volume products and generous annual price increases that fueled high profit margins and relegated cost-of-goods and inventory management to minor considerations. The new bio/pharmaceutical business model that has emerged in the past five years must incorporate smaller volume products that are expensive to manufacture but that face increasing resistance from the governments and insurance companies that are expected to pay for them. Further, the industry has become more global, with bio/pharmaceutical companies looking beyond their traditional markets to boost sales in emerging markets.
High costs of legacy facilities
Further, most CMOs are not very flexible when it comes to scheduling production. They insist on locking down production schedules at least three months in advance, and don’t have the flexibility to adjust schedules for a particular client product in the face of market demand changes. Increasingly, bio/pharmaceutical companies are trying to produce to demand rather than to inventory and need more flexible manufacturing operations.
The traditional CMO proposition offers bio/pharma companies the opportunity to avoid the capital costs of building their own facility, and the fixed operating costs of running a GMP-compliant operation. This rationale still has currency for smaller companies, but it doesn’t really hold much sway with global bio/pharmaceutical companies—and many mid-size companies—that are generating record levels of cash flow. They are looking for manufacturing operations that can serve a global supply chain in a flexible and cost-effective manner.
A new model
It is unlikely that we will see any CMOs moving toward this model in the foreseeable future. There will be significant upfront investment costs in establishing a network of such sites, and most CMOs currently generate barely enough cash flow to cover the capital investment needs of their current facilities.
However, establishing such a contract manufacturing network with a partner, say, one or more bio/pharmaceutical companies or a national government trying to establish a local bio/pharmaceutical infrastructure, could work. We know that bio/pharmaceutical companies are looking for manufacturing partners in a lot of third-tier markets like Algeria and Vietnam; we get inquiries about possible CMOs in such countries regularly.
About the Author
Jim Miller is president of Pharmsource Information Services, Inc., and publisher of Bio/Pharmaceutical Outsourcing Report, tel. 703.383.4903, email@example.com.