ABSTRACT
Prion diseases, or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders that
includes scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in animals, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans. The
prion agent shows remarkable resistance to common physiochemical inactivation procedures and conventional chemical disinfectants.
Methods that reduce TSE infectivity, such as treatment with a strong base or autoclaving, are not always compatible with maintaining
the biologic activity of proteins. Therefore, purification processes that separate therapeutic proteins from agents that might
cause TSE infectivity are necessary to reduce the possibility of transmission. It is reasonable to assume that available methods
to remove viruses and bacteria during the manufacture of gonadotropins are also capable of removing prions. In this study,
the authors explored whether a nanofiltration process used during the extraction process of follicle-stimulating hormone from
human urine can be effectively leveraged for removal of prions under conditions used for the manufacture of urine-derived
gonadotropins.
Prion diseases, or transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders that
includes scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in animals, and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) in humans (1).
The agent responsible for such infections is a protein molecule called PrPSc, a conformational variant of the normal host protein, PrPC. The key event in the pathogenesis of TSEs is believed to be the conversion of PrPC into the pathogenic isoform, PrPSc (2). The infectious agent causing TSEs is the prion, which may be identical to PrPSc, a partially protease-resistant isoform of a membrane glycoprotein termed PrPC (3).
Prion diseases of humans are undoubtedly transmissible and are described as genetic (familial), sporadic, or iatrogenic. Iatrogenic
transmission of TSEs has occurred through contaminated surgical instruments and through donations obtained from human tissues
(e.g., dura mater, pituitary gland, or cornea) (4–6). Evidence shows that prions, the infectious agents causing TSEs, can
colonize organs other than the central and peripheral nervous systems, and can be found in extra-cerebral compartments (7,
8).
While growing evidence suggests that infectivity can be transmitted in blood, the presence of PrPSc in urine and associated infectivity remains to be fully confirmed. However, the presence of the noninfective PrPC in some urinary gonadotropin drugs has been recently reported. This finding was not totally unexpected because of the ubiquity
and relative abundance of this physiological protein in various regions of the body (9). Indeed, some papers have reported
the presence of the infective PrPSc in the urine of animals in models of disease (10).
For these reasons, the debate regarding the use of urinary gonadotropins and their potential risk of transmission of variant
CJD is still ongoing (11). Risk assessments need to be conducted in both blood-derived products and urine-derived products,
such as gonadotropins, to determine the actual likelihood of transmitting infection and assess actions for risk mitigation.
The prion agent has several unusual characteristics, including a remarkable resistance to physiochemical inactivation procedures
such as heat, ionization, ultraviolet light, microwaves, and irradiation, and to conventional chemical disinfectants such
as detergents, alcohol, glutaraldehyde, and formalin (12). Methods that reduce TSE infectivity, such as treatment with a strong
base or autoclaving, are not in most cases compatible with maintaining the biologic activity of proteins (13). Therefore,
purification processes that separate therapeutic proteins from TSE infectivity are necessary to reduce the possibility of
TSE transmission by biological components.
Several techniques remove or inactivate PrPSc throughout the manufacturing processes and are applicable to the production of human menopausal gonadotropins and recombinant
follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH). Stringent regulatory measuresare already in place to account for viruses and bacteria
during the manufacture of gonadotropins, and it is reasonable to assume that such steps can remove significant amounts, if
not all, of PrPSc during the manufacturing process. Trials to remove TSE pathogens from biological materials have been made by several investigators
using precipitation, chromatography, and filtration (14–22).
The virus filtration step evaluated in this study is used by the Institut Biochimique SA (IBSA) during the process of extracting
FSH from human urine. FSH from human urine undergoes a purification process including precipitation with solvents, chromatography,
and ultrafiltration. These steps lead to a process that efficiently minimizes the risk of viral contamination in the final
product through inactivation, partition, and removal of the potential pathogenic agents.
This study evaluates the prion removal or inactivation achieved by nanofitration membranes (Viresolve normal flow parvovirus
[NFP], EMD Millipore) when used according to IBSA's process conditions for the purification of human-derived gonadotropins.